U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Antonio Patterson v. Star Conneley

Antonio Patterson v. Star Conneley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2013

Antonio Patterson v. Star Conneley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7521

ANTONIO DIEARGO PATTERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. STAR CONNELEY, Medical Supervisor; B. J. THOMAS, IGC Grievance; JON OZMINT, Head Director SCDC; WARDEN MACKIE; DORIS GANTT, Officer; THOMAS MOORE, Medical Director, Defendants – Appellees, and BILL BYER, New Head Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; WAYNE MCCABE, Warden; FRED THOMPSON, Assistant Warden, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (8:11-cv-02834-RMG)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 25, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Dieargo Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Rose MacLeod Osborne, Michael Charles Tanner, MICHAEL C. TANNER LAW OFFICE, Bamberg, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Antonio Dieargo Patterson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, denying his motion to amend his complaint, and denying as moot his motion to appoint counsel. Patterson also appeals the district court’s text order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to amend or alter that judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Conneley, No. 8:11-cv-02834-RMG (D.S.C. July 25, 2012; Aug. 1, 2012). We deny Patterson’s motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.