United States v. Victor James

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Victor James

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7896

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VICTOR V. JAMES, a/k/a Vic,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:09-cr-00073-TLW-15)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 26, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor V. James, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Victor V. James appeals the district court’s order

granting the Government’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion to

reduce his sentence. * On appeal, we confine our review to the

issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because James raises no issue pertaining to the district court’s

disposition in his informal brief, he has forfeited appellate

review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court granted the Rule 35(b) motion, James presumably seeks to appeal the extent of the sentence reduction.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished