United States v. Steven Carr

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Steven Carr

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6005

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEVEN DONEWAN CARR, a/k/a Steven D. Carr,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:98-cr-00246-RLV-2)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 26, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Donewan Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steven Donewan Carr appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration of its order granting his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. *

Because the district court lacked the authority to reconsider

its disposition of Carr’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, see United

States v. Goodwyn,

596 F.3d 233

, 235–36 (4th Cir. 2010), we

affirm the district court’s denial of relief. See United

States v. Carr, No. 5:98–cr–00246–RLV–2 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 14,

2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court granted Carr’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Carr’s sentence to the full extent he requested.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished