Roman Tiffer v. Worker's Compensation
Roman Tiffer v. Worker's Compensation
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1001
ROMAN TIFFER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WORKER’S COMPENSATION; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION; ABACUS CORPORATION; THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:12-cv-03662-CCB)
Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 26, 2013
Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roman Tiffer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Roman Tiffer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action seeking reversal of a state court judgment. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Tiffer’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Tiffer has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.