Hamid Mahjor v. James Peterson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hamid Mahjor v. James Peterson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1043

HAMID R. MAHJOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JAMES D. PETERSON, Deputy Commonwealth Attorney,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01461-LMB-JFA)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 26, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hamid R. Mahjor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Hamid R. Mahjor appeals the district court’s order

dismissing with prejudice his civil complaint against Deputy

Commonwealth Attorney James D. Peterson. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Mahjor v. Peterson, No.

1:12-cv-01461-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Dec. 27, 2012). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished