In Re: Judy Miskell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

In Re: Judy Miskell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2521

In Re: JUDY KAY MISKELL,

Petitioner.

_______________

On Petition for Writ of Prohibition. (3:12-cv-00052-GMG-DJJ)

No. 12-2549

JUDY KAY MISKELL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CONRAD W. VARNER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:12-cv-00052-GMG-DJJ)

Submitted: February 21, 2013 Decided: February 27, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. No. 12-2521 petition denied; No. 12-2549 affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Judy Kay Miskell, Petitioner/Appellant Pro Se. Melvin F. O’Brien, DICKIE, MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Judy Kay Miskell appeals the district court’s order

denying her Rule 59 motion. Miskell has also petitioned for a

writ of prohibition and filed a motion to stay. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court, deny the petition

for a writ of prohibition, and deny the motion to stay. Miskell

v. Varner, No. 3:12-cv-00052-GMG-DJJ (N.D. W. Va. Dec. 12,

2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

No. 12-2521 PETITION DENIED No. 12-2549 AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished