UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2332

MARGE IANNUCCI,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

and

MICHAEL A. IANNUCCI,

Plaintiff,

v.

RITE AID CORPORATION, et al,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: February 28, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marge Iannucci, Appellant Pro Se. Beth A. Moeller, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Atlanta, Georgia; Michael Lawrence Wade, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Marge Iannucci appeals the district court’s order

entering judgment in her employment discrimination action in

accordance with the Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 68 offer and

dismissing the remainder of the action for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction. She also appeals the order compelling

discovery and entering a confidentiality order. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Iannucci v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 1:11-cv-00281-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C.

July 24 & Oct. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3