U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Floyd Granger v. Director Bodiford

Floyd Granger v. Director Bodiford
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 28, 2013

Floyd Granger v. Director Bodiford

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7621

FLOYD GRANGER, a/k/a Floyd Randolph Granger, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DIRECTOR SCOTTY BODIFORD; GREENVILLE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER AND HEALTH SERVICES; UNKNOWN MEDICAL PERSONNEL; GREENVILLE COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:11-cv-01162-RBH)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: February 28, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Granger, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher R. Antley, DEVLIN & PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Floyd Granger appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Granger v. Dir. Bodiford, No. 6:11-cv-01162-RBH (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.