United States v. Seneca Allen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Seneca Allen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7994

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

SENECA RAYVON ALLEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (1:02-cr-00098-JAB-5)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: March 1, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Seneca Rayvon Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Ripley Eagles Rand, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Seneca Rayvon Allen appeals the district court’s order

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Allen, No. 1:02-cr-00098-JAB-5 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 31,

2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished