United States v. Michael Eugene Farmer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Michael Eugene Farmer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7988

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL EUGENE FARMER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:02-cr-00131-BO-1; 5:11-cv-00642-BO)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: March 1, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Eugene Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, J. Frank Bradsher, Eric David Goulian, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Eugene Farmer seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 2012) motion. The district court

also granted Farmer a certificate of appealability in an earlier

order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny Farmer’s motions for appointment of

counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Farmer, No. 5:02-cr-00131-BO-1; 5:11-

cv-00642-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished