U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Michael Eugene Farmer

United States v. Michael Eugene Farmer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 1, 2013

United States v. Michael Eugene Farmer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7988

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL EUGENE FARMER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:02-cr-00131-BO-1; 5:11-cv-00642-BO)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: March 1, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Eugene Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, J. Frank Bradsher, Eric David Goulian, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael Eugene Farmer seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The district court also granted Farmer a certificate of appealability in an earlier order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Farmer’s motions for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Farmer, No. 5:02-cr-00131-BO-1; 5:11- cv-00642-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.