U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Anthony Snipe

United States v. Anthony Snipe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 1, 2013

United States v. Anthony Snipe

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8090

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ANTHONY LAMAR SNIPE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (2:02-cr-00833-PMD-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: March 1, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Lamar Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Anthony Lamar Snipe appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.