Hunter v. Higgs

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Hunter v. Higgs, 503 F. App'x 215 (4th Cir. 2013)

Hunter v. Higgs

Opinion of the Court

*216Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chase Carmen Hunter appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to appoint counsel. Our review of the record reveals that we previously considered Hunter’s arguments and affirmed the district court’s order. Hunter v. Higgs, 479 Fed.Appx. 470 (4th Cir. 2012) (No. 12-1971). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss this appeal as duplicative. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Chase Carmen HUNTER v. Paul W. HIGGS, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of the City of Fredericksburg, Virginia William Reyes, III, individually and in his official capacity as a Deputy for the City of Fredericksburg Sheriff and in his official capacity as a paid worker for the City of Fredericksburg City of Fredericksburg, Virginia Nicholas Talbert, individually and in his official capacity as an employee for the City of Fredericksburg Sheriff and in his official capacity as a paid worker for the City of Fredericksburg
Status
Published