Pacetti v. Astrue

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Pacetti v. Astrue, 504 F. App'x 217 (4th Cir. 2013)

Pacetti v. Astrue

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bartola J. Pacetti appeals the district court’s orders granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pacetti v. Millard, No. 1:11-cv-01293-LO-TCB (E.D.Va. Mar. 27, 2012 & filed Aug. 22, 2012, entered Aug. 23, 2012). We deny Pacetti’s motion for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Bartola J. PACETTI v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration Mary Holt, and Mark S. Millard, Judge Alan Carlson State of California Office of Attorney General Kathy Ricci
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published