U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Pacetti v. Astrue

Pacetti v. Astrue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 2, 2013 · Davis, Keenan, Thacker
504 F. App'x 217

Counsel

Bartola J. Pacetti, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Ann Edelstein, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Pacetti v. Astrue

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bartola J. Pacetti appeals the district court’s orders granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pacetti v. Millard, No. 1:11-cv-01293-LO-TCB (E.D.Va. Mar. 27, 2012 & filed Aug. 22, 2012, entered Aug. 23, 2012). We deny Pacetti’s motion for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.