U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Redding

United States v. Redding
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 9, 2013 · Gregory, King, Niemeyer
504 F. App'x 219

United States v. Redding

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Erwin Bernard Redding appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Redding, No. 3:09-cr-00067-JPB-DJJ-1, 2012 WL 2370205 (N.D. W. Va. 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.