U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Lee v. Mayor of Baltimore

Lee v. Mayor of Baltimore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 22, 2013 · Gregory, Keenan, Shedd
505 F. App'x 278

Lee v. Mayor of Baltimore

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Reginald L. Lee appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman * doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Mayor & City Council of Balt., No. 1:12-cv-02418-JKB (D.Md. filed Sept. 14, 2012; entered Sept. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.