U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Cox v. Maryland

Cox v. Maryland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 24, 2013 · Niemeyer, Thacker, Wilkinson
506 F. App'x 244

Cox v. Maryland

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas R. Cox appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint against the State of Maryland and Anne Arundel County, and his defamation complaint against Kelly Pultz. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. *245Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v. Maryland, No. 1:12-cv-01364-GLR (D.Md. Sept. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.