U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Neal v. Duke Energy

Neal v. Duke Energy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 13, 2013 · Davis, Floyd, Wynn
509 F. App'x 280

Neal v. Duke Energy

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bridgette Neal appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.