U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Miskell v. Varner

Miskell v. Varner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 27, 2013 · Agee, Davis, Hamilton
511 F. App'x 272

Miskell v. Varner

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Judy Kay Miskell appeals the district court’s order denying her Rule 59 motion. Miskell has also petitioned for a writ of prohibition and filed a motion to stay. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, deny the petition for a writ of prohibition, and deny the motion to stay. Miskell v. Varner, No. 3:12-cv-00052-GMG-DJJ (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 12-2521 PETITION DENIED.

No. 12-2549 AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.