U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Toney v. Lasalle Bank National Ass'n

Toney v. Lasalle Bank National Ass'n
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 28, 2013 · Diaz, Motz, Wynn
512 F. App'x 363

Counsel

Laura Toney, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ashley Muckenfuss, McGuirewoods, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Sean Alexander O’Connor, Finkel Law Firm, LLC, North Charleston, South Carolina, for Ap-pellees.

Toney v. Lasalle Bank National Ass'n

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Laura Toney appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Toney v. LaSalle Bank Nat’l Ass’n, No. 3:11-cv-01686-MBS, 896 F.Supp.2d 455 (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2012). We deny Toney’s “Motion to Request Federal Identification,” and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.