U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Nicholson

United States v. Nicholson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 1, 2013 · Diaz, Motz, Wynn
512 F. App'x 366

United States v. Nicholson

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leon Nicholson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motion for specific performance of his plea agreement, and has filed a motion for a transcript at Government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Nicholson’s motion for a transcript at Government expense and affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Nicholson, No. 4:04-cr-00088-RBS-TEM-1 (E.D.Va. filed Oct. 12, 2012; entered Oct. 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.