U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Barnett

United States v. Barnett
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 1, 2013 · Diaz, Motz, Wynn
512 F. App'x 367

United States v. Barnett

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jokari Lee Barnett appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying his motions to appoint counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Barnett, No. 3:10-cr-00005-JPD-DJJ-1 (ND.W.Va. Aug. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.