U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Snipe

United States v. Snipe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 1, 2013 · Diaz, Motz, Wynn
512 F. App'x 383

United States v. Snipe

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lamar Snipe appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.