U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Charles

United States v. Charles
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 1, 2013 · Diaz, Motz, Wynn
513 F. App'x 259

United States v. Charles

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Charles appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Charles, No. 3:04-cr-00142-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.