U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Allen

United States v. Allen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 1, 2013 · Diaz, Motz, Wynn
513 F. App'x 259

United States v. Allen

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Seneca Rayvon Allen appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Allen, No. 1:02-cr-00098-JAB-5 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.