U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Sung Kun Kim v. Panetta

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 1, 2013 · Keenan, King, Niemeyer

516 F. App'x 268

Counsel

Sung Kun Kim, Appellant pro se. David Moskowitz, Assistant United States Attorney, Julie Ann Edelstein, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Hemingway v. Kroger Company, The (District Court, D. South Carolina 2025)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sung Kun Kim appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer in Kim’s action alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kim v. Panetta, No. 1:11-cv-01370-LMB-TCB, 2012 WL 3600288 (E.D.Va. Aug. 21, *2692012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.