U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Coward

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 2013 · Keenan, King, Niemeyer

516 F. App'x 279

Counsel

Carlos Ernest Coward, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Ernest Coward appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coward, No. 7:07-cr-00069-*280GEC-3 (W.D.Va. Dec. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.