United States v. Ross
United States v. Ross
516 F. App'x 287
United States v. Ross
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Hazel L. Ross appeals the district court’s order denying her second motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ross, No. 7:09-cr-00890-JMC-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional' process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.