U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Ross

United States v. Ross
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 2013 · Keenan, King, Niemeyer
516 F. App'x 287

United States v. Ross

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Hazel L. Ross appeals the district court’s order denying her second motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ross, No. 7:09-cr-00890-JMC-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional' process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.