U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Promise

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 2013 · Agee, Hamilton, Wilkinson

517 F. App'x 149

Counsel

Marion Promise, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Dana Owen Washington, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Brandon Williams v. M. Mitchell (4th Cir. 2024)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marion Promise appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion to correct sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Promise, No. 3:98-cr-00007-GCM-2 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.