U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Anderson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 4, 2013 · Diaz, Hamilton, Niemeyer

517 F. App'x 169

Counsel

William Junior Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Christopher Morris, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Junior Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Anderson, No. 3:97-cr-00110-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.