U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Monroy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 4, 2013 · Duncan, Shedd, Wynn

517 F. App'x 171

Counsel

Josué Monroy, Appellant Pro Se. George Jarrod Hazel, Arun G. Rao, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

*172Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Josué Monroy appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Monroy, No. 8:10-cr-00237-AW-1 (DMd. Nov. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.