U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Rufus

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 10, 2013 · Hamilton, Niemeyer, Wilkinson

518 F. App'x 168

Counsel

Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, William Kenneth Wither-spoon, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Alonza Rufus appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Rufus, No. 3:02-cr-00550-MBS-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.