U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Cox v. McMahon

Cox v. McMahon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 23, 2013 · Davis, Gregory, Wilkinson
519 F. App'x 146

Counsel

Robert M. Cox, Cherie M. Cox, Appellants Pro Se.

Cox v. McMahon

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert and Cherie Cox appeal the district court’s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dis*147miss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Cox v. McMahon, No. 2:12-cv-00689-AWA-LRL (E.D.Va. Jan. 10, 14, & 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.