U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Prince v. O'Brien

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 23, 2013 · Davis, Gregory, Wilkinson

519 F. App'x 170

Counsel

Brian C. Prince, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Richmond v. Bragg (District Court, D. South Carolina 2021)
Richmond v. Bragg (District Court, D. South Carolina 2021)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brian C. Prince, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 *171U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Prince v. O’Brien, 1:12-cv-00064-IMK-JSK, 2013 WL 441870 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 5, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.