U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Hoskins v. Napolitano

Hoskins v. Napolitano
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 24, 2013 · Gregory, Hamilton, Motz
519 F. App'x 191

Hoskins v. Napolitano

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James F. Hoskins appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint for race and disability discrimination and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoskins v. Napolitano, No. 1:12-cv-00639-RDB (D.Md. Nov. 28 & Dec. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.