U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. McDowney

United States v. McDowney
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 30, 2013 · Agee, Hamilton, Wynn
520 F. App'x 183

United States v. McDowney

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone McDowney appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.