U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Bowie v. Henderson Police Department

Bowie v. Henderson Police Department
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 2013 · Agee, Hamilton, Motz
520 F. App'x 241

Counsel

Edward Bowie, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Bowie v. Henderson Police Department

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Edward Bowie appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bowie v. Henderson Police Dept., No. 5:12-cv-00514-FL, 2012 WL 5392116 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2012 & Jan. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.