Armstrong v. Sumner
Armstrong v. Sumner
521 F. App'x 163
Armstrong v. Sumner
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Armstrong v. Sumner, No. 5:12-cv-00425-F, 2013 WL 556209 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.