U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Holley v. Shirley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 16, 2013 · Diaz, Floyd, Wilkinson

521 F. App'x 176

Counsel

Tanyin B. Holley, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Norris & St. Clair, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

SEELIG v. PERRY (District Court, M.D. North Carolina 2020)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tanyin B. Holley, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant D. Shirley in Holley’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no re*177versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holley v. Shirley, No. l:ll-cv-00508-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 19 & entered Nov. 20, 2012). We deny Holley’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.