U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Ingram

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 22, 2013 · Motz, Niemeyer, Wilkinson

521 F. App'x 183

Counsel

Leroy N. Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leroy N. Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction in his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated *184by the district court. See United States v. Ingram, No. 3:05-cr-00500-HEH-l (E.D.Va. Jan. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.