U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Sarr

United States v. Sarr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 29, 2013 · Agee, Hamilton, Motz
521 F. App'x 229

United States v. Sarr

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ibrahima Sarr appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial under Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Sarr, No. 2:06-cr-00056-RBS-FBS-1 (E.D.Va. filed Jan. 30, 2013; *230entered Jan. 31, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.