Coulibaly v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cases that cite this one
113 later published cases cite this decision. The 18 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Jackson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (District Court, D. Maryland 2022)
- Kelley II v. O'Malley (District Court, D. Maryland 2024)
- Reynolds v. Mayorkas (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Shing v. Howard County, MD Department of Assessments and Taxation (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Raktabutr v. T-Mobile (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Neuberger, Quinn, Gielen, Rubin & Gibber, P.A. v. United States (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Karanja v. Matemu, Esq. (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Lyons v. Maryland Child Support Administration (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Brooks v. Maryland Legal Aid (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Shabazz v. Meridian Bank (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Sammy v. Williams-Sammy (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Melton v. Baltimore City Police Dept. (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Shomo v. Cooksey (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Bryant v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Umana v. Prince George's County, MD (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Gang v. Hughes (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Royster v. United Airlines (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Aborisade v. Kenny (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Dr. Tiemoko Coulibaly and Dr. Fatou Gaye-Coulibaly appeal the district court’s orders granting the motions to dismiss their claims filed by Defendants other than JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss filed by Chase, denying their motions for recusal and reconsideration, and granting Chase’s motion for summary judgment in their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coulibaly v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 8:10-cv-03517-DKC (D. Md. Sept. 7, 2012; Dec. 28, 2011; Dec. 12, 2011; Sept. 16, 2011 & Aug. 8, 2011). We deny Chase’s motion to strike the informal brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.