U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Cross

United States v. Cross
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 17, 2013 · Floyd, King, Niemeyer
528 F. App'x 379

Counsel

William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Cross

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s margin order denying his motion to correct a clerical error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-l (E.D.Va. Sept. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*380fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.