U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Anderson v. Pruitt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 18, 2013 · Floyd, King, Niemeyer

529 F. App'x 341

Counsel

Jerome Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert T. Numbers, II, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Lawton v. Camp Lejeune Toxic Water (District Court, E.D. North Carolina 2023)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Anderson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny reconsideration of the court’s earlier order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Pruitt, No. 1:10-cv-00553-NCT-JEP (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2013). We dispense *342with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.