Hill v. Carter
Hill v. Carter
531 F. App'x 295
Hill v. Carter
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Keon S. Hill appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Carter, No. 1:12-cv-00656-TSE-TRJ, 2013 WL 709089 (E.D.Va. Feb. 27, 2013). We deny Hills’ motions to appoint counsel, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.