U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Houser

United States v. Houser
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 28, 2013 · Hamilton, Keenan, Motz
531 F. App'x 339

United States v. Houser

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rufus Houser appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States *340v. Houser, No. 3:95-cr00012-JPB-3, 2013 WL 310291 (ND.W.Va. Jan. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.