U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

In re Hurt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 1, 2013 · Hamilton, Niemeyer, Shedd

531 F. App'x 358

Counsel

Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Sanderford v. Duplin Land Dev., Inc. (N.C. Ct. App. 2016)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order imposing a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re: Hurt, No. 8:12-mc-00512 (D.Md. Jan. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.