U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

George v. Mabus

George v. Mabus
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 10, 2013
532 F. App'x 369

Counsel

Paula D. George, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

George v. Mabus

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Paula D. George appeals the district court’s order dismissing George’s motion for settlement as moot. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. George v. Mabus, No. 4:11-cv-00106-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.