U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Little

United States v. Little
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 22, 2013 · Motz, Shedd, Wilkinson
533 F. App'x 339

Counsel

Ryan O’Neil Little, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Little

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ryan O’Neil Little appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part Little’s motion to remove the district court’s previous order denying relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Little, No. 3:95-cr-00105-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2012). We further deny Little’s motion for return of all materials and property held by USP Lee County. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.