U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Hodge v. Stephens

Hodge v. Stephens
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 22, 2013 · Motz, Shedd, Wilkinson
533 F. App'x 344

Hodge v. Stephens

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chant'N. Hodge and Harold H. Hodge, Jr., appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on their civil action and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hodge v. Stephens, No. 8:12-cv-01988-AW (D.Md. Jan. 31 & Mar. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.