U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Hodge v. Stephens

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 22, 2013 · Motz, Shedd, Wilkinson

533 F. App'x 344

Counsel

Chanté N. Hodge, Harold H. Hodge, Jr., Appellants Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gate-wood, Phillip M. Pickus, Office of the Attorney General Of Maryland, Pikesville, Maryland; John Francis Breads, Jr., Matthew Douglas Peter, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Jones v. Davis (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
Matthis v. Somerset County Detention Center (District Court, D. Maryland 2019)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Chant'N. Hodge and Harold H. Hodge, Jr., appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on their civil action and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hodge v. Stephens, No. 8:12-cv-01988-AW (D.Md. Jan. 31 & Mar. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.